- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by
Warren B. Musselman.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forums › Knowledge Base › AP Motor Discussion – Certified › Aerotech 38mm enlarged closure?
I’ve had an AT 1080 casing for a while, but have never bothered to fly it. Now i have a mild case of minimum diameter, so I’ll throw a J570 at it.
I was actually looking at the instructions to see if it needed a different forward closure like the long-burn motors do, and i see this:
38mm enlarged aft closure
I dont know where this Rouse-tech motor originally came from, and all I have ever flown with AT 38mm is a bunch of I-284 (38/600), so I don’t know whether I have an “enlarged” one or not (damn this whole thing sounds like a viagra commercial).
Dimensional drawings on Aerotech’s web site all look the same, and do not have the nozzle opening diameter listed. Other instructions look the same, and of course the only motor i have on hand to look at is yet another I284.
Maybe only the inside area constitutes “enlarged”? See pic of how its machined.
Here’s pics … if someone has both kinds, could you kindly send a photo of both?
Outside:
Inside:
Profile:
From the picture it looks as if you have what it takes. The previously issued and now outdated smaller aft closures have been pretty much eliminated from the offerrings. Didn’t really alter the performance of the motors, just made a better fit for the nozzles.
Thanks Joe. I have Rouse-Tech casings with obviously (red) Dr. Rocket forward closures, and who knows what on the aft… so its a crap shoot as to when these were actually manufactured.
I had figured that at some point AT made a motor that needed a different nozzle design that wouldn’t fit the aft closure, and there begat the “enlarged” one. Come on HPR junkies, what year was it?!?!?
[ rain dance! ]
Don’t forget the seal disk and o-ring. It’s quite spectacular when you do.
Yup, thanks Warren, I’m good and paranoid on that already.
I only say that because one of my 5 L2 attempts failed because of a missing seal disk and o-ring… and I needed to buy a new case and forward closure because of it.
We are Good to Go with our scheduled and approved launch on Saturday April 5th and Sunday April 6th, from the North Site, subject to change – Mostly cloudy and High Winds predicted. Range and waiver should be active by 9AM on Saturday. The Pawnee National Grassland remains fragile and dry, so extra precautions are in order. Please stay on the authorized roads and please don’t park more than 100’ off the road at the flight line.